Reference:
A.N. Tarau,
B. De Schutter, and
J. Hellendoorn,
"Route choice control of automated baggage handling systems,"
Proceedings of the 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation
Research Board, Washington, DC, 14 pp., Jan. 2009. Paper 09-0432.
Abstract:
State-of-the-art baggage handling systems transport luggage in an
automated way using destination coded vehicles (DCVs). These vehicles
transport the bags at high speeds on a "mini" railway network.
Currently, the networks are simple, with only a few junctions, since
otherwise bottlenecks would be created at the junctions. This makes
the system inefficient. In the research we conduct, more complex
networks are considered. In order to optimize the performance of the
system we develop and compare centralized and decentralized control
methods that can be used to route the DCVs through the track network.
The proposed centralized control method is model predictive control
(MPC). Due to the large computation effort centralized MPC requires,
decentralized MPC and a fast decentralized heuristic approach are also
proposed. When implementing the decentralized approaches, each
junction has its own local controller for positioning the switch going
into the junction and the switch going out of the junction. In order
to assess the advantages and disadvantages of centralized MPC,
decentralized MPC, and the decentralized heuristic approach, we also
discuss a simple benchmark case study. The considered control methods
are compared for several scenarios. Results indicate that centralized
MPC becomes intractable when a large stream of bags has to be handled,
while decentralized MPC can still be used to suboptimally solve the
problem. Moreover, the decentralized heuristic approach usually gives
worse results than those obtained when using decentralized MPC, but
with very low computation time.